The Worm
Ouroboros
by Eric Rücker Eddison
***
I could hardly believe my
eyes when, searching for overlooked pre-Tolkienesque fantasies, I found
Listverse’s “Top 10 Underrated Fantasy Stories Before 1937,” and its mention of E.R. Eddison’s 1922 magnum opus, The Worm Ouroboros. “My favorite novel,” gushed
the Listverse writer. And I thought, wow, who knew anybody but me loved
Eddison’s work?
Ouroboros is
the tale of the warring kingdoms of Witchland and Demonland, set ostensibly on
the planet Mercury, whose history endlessly repeats itself. The title refers,
not to any of the characters, but to the dragon (“worm” in Old English) of
Norse mythology that swallows its own tail, with no beginning or ending. And
it’s told in a 16th century idiom reminiscent of Shakespeare in an
opium dream.
Although J.R.R. Tolkien had some praise for Ouroboros, which got a 1950’s reprint following the
success of at his Lord of the Rings, at this point you may understand why Eddison’s works haven’t exactly
become cultural icons.
Still, I think his books may yet get their due in 21st century fantasy realms. His “Demons”
and “Witches,” along with his other nations of Pixies, Imps, Goblins and Ghouls
don’t sound as bizarre to readers steeped in paranormal fantasy today as they must
have in the early decades of the previous century; his byzantine,
sexually-charged plot twists familiar ground to Game of Thrones enthusiasts.
And computer-generated
animation seems made to delve into Eddison’s sometimes descriptions of setting,
such as this one for the audience chamber in the palace of Lord Juss, ruler of
Demonland, whose support pillars are each topped with a precious stone “carved
by the hand of some sculptor of long ago into the living form of a monster:
here was a harpy with screaming mouth, so wondrously cut in ochre-tinted jade
it was a marvel to hear no scream from her: here in wine-yellow topaz a flying
fire-drake:…there a star sapphire the colour of moonlight, cut for a cyclops,
so that the rays of the star trembled from his single eye….”
Eddison lavished similar detail
on everything from the dresses of the highly decorative princesses and damsels
accompanying his heroes to Himalayan-rivaling mountain ranges. His characters
are equally baroque: heroes inimitably brave, strong and good; villains equally
brave, strong and evil. The action is tremendous, beginning with an epic single
combat, a wrestling match between the evil king of Witchland and Lord Juss’s
brother, the Demonland champion, for domination of their world.
But Witches are witches.
No, actually, they’re not. Their kings are powerfully evil sorcerers more like
Tolkien’s Saruman than Halloween (or even Shakespearean) crones stirring
cauldrons. So they’re not about to let the Demons’ win in the wrestling match
keep them from plotting more villainy. In Eddison’s viewpoint, there are no
shadows, no in-betweens. And neither side ever, ever gives up.
As the introduction to the
1952 edition states, perhaps with a hint of wistfulness, “There are no
complications, no reservations and no excuses here. Pagan these warriors may be
(actually, Eddison is notably short on religious overtones) and semi-barbarous,
but they are not oppressed by weasel-faced doubts or whining uncertainties…and
life itself is joyful and wonderful.”
But there, I haven’t even
gotten to the melancholy traitor Gro (the only character with any approach to complexity, little good though it does him). Or to the Scarlet
Pimpernellish Demon Lord Brandoch Daha or the May-December romance between lovely
Prezmyra and Witchland’s cunning old warrior Corund. I’ll continue this
discussion next Friday, although readers who want to read (or reread) will be
able to see the entire story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment