Review of: The Devil’s Defender – My Odyssey Through American Criminal Justice
from Ted Bundy to the Kandahar Massacre
Author: John Henry Browne
Publisher: Chicago Review Press
Source: Dallas Public Library
Grade: A
He’s defended some of America’s
most notorious mass murderers, from Ted Bundy to a perpetrator of one of the
West Coast’s biggest mass murders, to the U.S. soldier convicted of killing
dozens of unarmed villagers in a night-long shooting spree in Kandahar,
Afghanistan. And he’s done this since his own girlfriend was brutally murdered.
How does criminal lawyer John Henry Browne justify his defense of such killers? Browne tells all, including
his own struggles with drugs and alcohol, and what he really thinks of some of
his clients in his memoir, The Devil’s
Defender: My Odyssey Through American Criminal Justice from Ted Bundy to the
Kandahar Massacre.
He grew up the son of an engineer
whose work provided the enriched uranium for the earliest atomic bombs, helped
pay his way through college by shepherding the likes of Morrison and Jimi
Hendrix through West Coast drug scenes, and became radicalized during the
protests of the Vietnam war era. He was determined to fight his induction into
the Army, but was actually rejected because of his 6-foot 7-inch height. (The
draft at the time excluded anyone over 6-feet 6-inches.)
After law school, he posed as a
child molester to enter a Washington State prison as one of its few white
inmates, intending to help the state rewrite its rules of incarceration. He
writes that he chose an alibi as a child rapist because he wanted “to
experience the most extreme treatment. Prisoners hate pedophiles.”
(He managed to avoid the worst of
the other inmates’ abuse, for which he credits the help of a fellow prisoner, a
member of a revolutionary civil rights group. However, readers may wonder if Browne’s
extreme size also helped deter other inmates.)
When Browne and two other
employees of Washington State’s attorney general’s office drafted new due
process rules to protect prisoners, prison administrators and correctional
officers resisted. Browne contacted an old friend from law school and asked him
to use the state. Washington lost the suit, effectively giving the new due
process rules a court-ordered backing. Still, Browne burned out quickly from
his task of prison reform. Within two years, he left his state job to join a
public defender’s office.
His most infamous client, Ted
Bundy, would soon enter his life.
Although Browne had spoken to Bundy
earlier in connection with the lesser charge of kidnapping, he was surprised by
the change in Bundy’s behavior when they met in Salt Lake City in January 1977,
where Bundy was now also charged with one count of murder. The media frenzy Browne
anticipated from the meeting was overshadowed by still another murderer – Gary Gilmore
– and his controversial request to be executed by firing squad.
Given Bundy’s taste for publicity,
he may have been annoyed to be ousted, at least temporarily, from the headlines.
Possibly that caused the change Browne noticed.
“Ted stopped being coy about the
charges against him. He informed me that he was involved in . . . murders in
Washington State and was responsible for countless other homicides in
California, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah. This was no shock, as I had for some time
considered him to be exactly who the police thought he was. But to hear the man
say it was another thing. . . ”
Ultimately, Browne was unable to save
Bundy from himself. Possibly, Browne surmises, Bundy couldn’t resist the final
publicity stunt of execution, which Browne declined Bundy’s request to witness.
“. . . two years after (Bundy’s
execution) I sat in a darkened theater on Bainbridge Island, Washington. The
movie was The Silence of the Lambs. .
. I never made it to the end of the film. . . I felt sick to my stomach – just as
I had my last time in Ted Bundy’s cell.
“People often ask me, ‘If you’re
so disgusted with these acts of evil, why are you a criminal defense lawyer?’”
His answer: “because I believe
killing is wrong, whether it’s committed by an individual or sponsored by the
state. I’m also all too aware of how fallible our system is, that it can and
does charge and convict the wrong people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment