Snippets only posted
here – and despite readers’ kindness in asking me to review their books, I must
still decline. My schedule is only getting tighter as more issues about my
sister’s estate crop up.
***
First up: When We Were Orphans, by Kazuo Ishiguro. While searching
for a compatible reading group years ago, I came across one in Dallas that
specializes in reading books by non-U.S. authors and non-U.S. cultures. The
reading choices of its members tend to be more high-brow than those I would
pick if left to my own devices, which is not a bad thing. As it happens, I’m a
fan of historical fiction (preferably of the non-bodice ripping kind) and
Ishiguro’s depiction of the inter-war British colony in Shanghai and the
Sino-Japanese war of 1937-1945 is a masterpiece of historical research.
Beginning with the
mysterious disappearance of a British couple in Shanghai, Ishiguro follows the
career of their young son, Christopher Banks, ripped from his life in China and
friendship with the young Japanese boy next door in the insulated international
colony to the care of an elderly aunt in England.
Always the odd one out
in school and society (perhaps like Ishiguro himself, a Japanese national brought up in England),
Christopher becomes a professional consulting detective, joining the likes of
Hercule Poirot, Lord Peter Whimsey, and a myriad of other heroes from the
golden age of English detective fiction. But despite his fame in England, Christopher’s
guiding ambition is to return to China and solve the mystery of his parents’
disappearance.
I found When We Were Orphans plodding in its
early stages and disliked what seemed to me to be Ishiguro’s tendency to use
his protagonist as a mere way to display the history. However, the story’s intensity
increased with Christopher’s return decades later to Shanghai, where he learns
that things are not – and never were – the way he remembered them from
childhood. Ishiguro’s depiction of Christopher’s journey through a city and its
people on the verge of collapse is almost hallucinatory in its horror and
strangeness. Grade: 4/5.
***
Next: Autumn in Venice: Ernest Hemingway and his
Last Muse, by Andrea di Robilant. I listened
to this on an audio CD, a favorite method of whiling away the tedium of long
drives – in this case, to and from the airport from which I travelled to my
sister’s former home in Mexico. The book traces approximately the last decade
of Hemingway’s life, and his emotional – although possibly Platonic – love
affair with young Adriana Ivancich. When they first met in 1948, following
Hemingway’s off-the-cuff decision to return to scenes of his World War I
service in Italy, he was nearing fifty (and married to his fourth wife, Mary
Welsh). Adriana was only 18, and barely out of convent school.
image: pixabay |
In the #metoo era, Hemingway’s relationship with
Adriana looks creepily like the sexual “grooming” of abusers, although in her
memoir published after his death, Adriana insisted they got beyond kissing and
cuddling. And perhaps my experience with my sister’s descent into alcohol-fuel
rages and mental collapse colored my nightmarish impression of Hemingway’s
final, booze-soaked years.
Still, Autumn in Venice is a memorable account
of the last bloom of a literary icon, as well as life with the jet-set of
post-World War II Italian aristocracy. A bonus – the Italian author’s great-uncle
was one Hemingway’s drinking pals of the era! Grade: 4/5.
***
Next: I, Mammal: The Story of What Makes Us
Mammals, by Liam Drew. This book by British writer (and
former neurobiologist) Liam Drew caught my eye when a local branch of the
Dallas Public Library featured it on its new books shelf. The evolution of the
mammalian scrotum and placenta? How about the evolution of the mammary glands,
the organs which have given their name to the vertebrate class to which Drew, I
and presumably you readers belong?
If this sounds like
heavyweight reading, it’s not. I originally planned to major in biology in
college (before quickly changing to journalism!) but even a high school course
in the science should be enough to carry the average reader through Drew’s
discussions.
Even those who
sometimes feel their minds being stretched by the subject matter – not a bad
thing – will find themselves hooked on the charm of Drew’s writing, with
personal illustrations throughout of the organs that nurtured his daughters
through fetal and early childhood development.
And after all, why
shouldn’t gonads share the “sex appeal” that more common discussions of brains
usually usurp in evolutionary discussion? Try dropping a hint or three into
your next cocktail party conversation and watch what happens. Although, by the
way, how did mammals and birds – that other warm-blooded (oops – endothermic)
vertebrate class with which we mammals share the planet – find different ways
to develop their brainy intellects? Grade: 5/5.
***
Finally, A Murder is Announced, by Agatha Christie.
Yes, it’s just occurring to me as I write that this final read of the month,
like the first, When We Were Orphans,
is a detective story, and one from a writer who might have inspired Ishiguro’s
protagonist. I found it in one of the many cupboards and cabinets where my
sister had stashed her books. The last time
I visited her before her cirrhosis-fueled decline, she had complained that she couldn’t find a book club because of a shortage of books – presumably English-language books – in San Miguel. So, I was amazed at the stacks of books – probably numbering in the hundreds – I found in her house during her days. Among them was this Christie classic, whose tattered cover I hope was testimony of the solace my sister found in reading it.
I visited her before her cirrhosis-fueled decline, she had complained that she couldn’t find a book club because of a shortage of books – presumably English-language books – in San Miguel. So, I was amazed at the stacks of books – probably numbering in the hundreds – I found in her house during her days. Among them was this Christie classic, whose tattered cover I hope was testimony of the solace my sister found in reading it.
In what must be one of
the most compelling hooks in detective fiction, the inhabitants of the English
village of Chipping Cleghorn find the following announcement in the well-read
“Personals” section of the local newspaper: “A murder is announced, and will
take place Friday, October 29, at Little Paddocks at 6:30 p.m. Friends, accept
this, the only intimation.”
Their amazement is
nothing compared to that of the inhabitants of the house known as Little
Paddocks themselves – retired financial secretary Letitia Blacklock and old
schoolmate, Dora “Bunny” Bunner.
Silly though the
notice seems, Miss Blacklock realizes it will draw all her curious neighbors
and prepares her household, which also includes her two 20-something cousins, a
boarding “lady” gardener, and a flighty refugee who claims her current status
as cook is far beneath her educational and social standing in her (unspecified)
Central European country of origin, for visitors on the announced date and
time.
As a crowd gathers
inside the Little Paddocks drawing room, the lights suddenly go out, a masked
man throws the door open and dazzles the eyes of the company with a flashlight
beam. Shots ring out and the masked man drops to the floor. When the lights are
restored, Miss Blacklock’s ear is bleeding, apparently grazed by a bullet.
However, the only person shot dead is the intruder himself.
But if the would-be
murderer is dead, why do more bodies pile up as the days go by? Luckily,
amateur sleuth Miss Jane Marple is visiting old friends in Chipping Cleghorn
and steps in to aid the baffled local police. But can she find the killer
before the killer finds her?
“Queen of crime”
Christie was still at the top of her game in 1950’s A Murder is Announced, but the solution to this whodunnit involves
too many bizarre coincidences for my taste. On a side note, xenophobia and
disdain for even the most pathetic refugees of the recent war exhibited by the
inhabitants of Chipping Cleghorn is, still seems pertinent in 2019. Grade: 4/5.
Oops -- on my original review of Liam Drew's I, Mammal, I used the term "order" in referring to the scientific classification of mammals and birds. The proper term is" class," which I have since corrected.
ReplyDelete