Foster’s way: as easy as 1-2-3. And then, 4-5-6-7.
The 1-2-3 part stands for beginning, middle, and end.
The beginning gets is own 1-2-3, the middle a round of 4-5-6, the end a 7. Do
three plus seven equal a perfect 10? Score!
The
beginning’s #1: a character in #2 a setting with #3 a problem.
OK, so how do we let readers know who the main
character is? “Giving a name is not enough,” Foster told her audience. We have
to worm our way inside that character’s head. “Show us who she is and what she
cares about. Otherwise, you’re just typing.”
And although she analyzed movie plots to illustrate
her points, she was careful to note that “books aren’t movies.” Don’t forget
the details, because, unlike scriptwriters, writers of fiction won’t have actors,
location hunters, decorators, or music to fill in their characters and worlds. And “it’s a character and details that pull
readers in.”
 |
| image: pixabay |
One character only? What about ensemble casts? “Even
if the story is about a group, there is always one central character who
everybody else revolves around,” was Foster’s take.
And give that character a setting, not an empty stage,
to stand on while we’re getting to know her.
And about that problem – the one that opens the story
“doesn’t necessarily have to be the main story problem.” Find a dilemma that
will intrigue the reader, and build on it as necessary.
Because
that’s what the middle’s #4-6 are for.
Which, by the way, can be expanded as needed, but the fairy
tale rule of 3’s is a time-tested favorite narrative device.
Why not simply start in the middle, in media res, in the first place? The term means starting in the
midst of an action, which is fine with Foster. Except that starting in the
middle of things doesn’t mean the beginning can be neglected. All three of the
beginning’s elements must still be included, because as the story’s true middle
unfolds, the character’s problems are only going to get worse.
The
elements unique to the middle are #4 the character’s attempt to solve the
initial problem, #5 her failure (or her success, which only leads to a greater
problem), with #6 everything now on the line as she makes a final effort -- the
climax of the story.
How the character solves, or tries to solve, her problems
matters as well. Her attempts at solutions must be done in an intelligent way,
Foster said, or at least, “the solution must make sense to the character.”
“Whether or not she succeeds, things must only get
worse!” Foster said. “Spray paint it on the wall!” because it’s through these
repeated attempts, whether successes or failures, that the story’s character
development and world building occur, and that it reaches climactic moment
after which nothing will be the same, either physically or emotionally.
And that’s the end, right?
Wrong. “The climax is not the ending of the story,”
Foster said.
The
ending is #7 validation. Or at least resolution.
“I’ll tell you a secret,” Foster said. “The ending is
what sells your next story.” It can include tying up or at least acknowledging
any threads left dangling from the beginning or middle, a “medal pinning”
celebration/ceremony/party, and a “happily ever after” or “happily ever after
for now” notice – the last two particularly important for any romantic elements
involved in the plot.
And now we’re really finished, right? Maybe. Or maybe
not.
“Sometimes you need an epilogue,” Foster said, an
after note that is either separated by time or space from the main narrative,
given in a point of view different from the main narrative, or includes events
outside that narrative.
THE
END
Yes, really, but check out Foster’s list of reference materials for more, more, and still more. And check the Writers Guild of Texas for more programs,
including its spring workshop, April 28.
