While pitching to an agent at the
2017 DFW Writers Conference, I got a question I’d never heard before: do you
think this book has series potential?
Luckily, like any good fiction
writer, I answered yes (the answer to
pretty much any question about writing). Equally luckily, a fellow critique
member had already told me my book had series potential.
Laura Maisano |
Luckiest of all, I’d attended
editor/author Laura Maisano’s class on “Sequels, Series and Spin-offs, Oh My!” earlier that day, where she
asked, “What is so hard about book two?”
Before those of us in her audience
could say anything stupid, like, I blew
everything in the first book! she walked us through what sequels and/or
subsequent books in a series, can – and can’t – do.
“It’s not just another chapter,
not just a ‘middle,’” she told us.
Like book one, a subsequent book needs not only to continue the overall story arc, but also to be complete in itself, with its own internal arc and a satisfying ending. It’s not a matter of writing a single long book and chopping it arbitrarily into parts. Neither can an author assume that readers have read the earlier book or books before they open the covers of the subsequent volumes.
Like book one, a subsequent book needs not only to continue the overall story arc, but also to be complete in itself, with its own internal arc and a satisfying ending. It’s not a matter of writing a single long book and chopping it arbitrarily into parts. Neither can an author assume that readers have read the earlier book or books before they open the covers of the subsequent volumes.
But she also can’t afford to bore
readers who have read the earlier books and, like a group she called “super
fans,” remembers every word. That said, Maisano delineated three basic types of
reader whose unique needs must be taken into account by sequel writers:
·
The super fan: OMG, I read your book a millisecond ago!
·
The ideal reader: I read the previous book when it came out
about a year ago.
·
The random reader: Hey, it’s a neat cover!
To take care of each of these
types of readers, sprinkle required knowledge – anything the reader must know now for the story to make sense – into the
early chapters, roughly chapters one through six (or thereabouts).
Pick a starting point where there’s
room for this – a big emotional point, or action scene, or major plot point,
and don’t be afraid to define things. Just don’t try to cram everything into
the very beginning.
Among those need-to-know
essentials are the same issues addressed in book one: the main character, with
an idea of his/her personality; the story’s setting; and the main character’s
personal goal as well as at least hints of the overall story goal. And of
course, the hook – for the book, or at least the first plot point (the
significant event that moves the story’s action).
But won’t subsequent books have to
contain a lot of backstory?
Yes, but. . . “Sprinkle the
information in as needed. The biggest thing is to sprinkle it without
disturbing the current story. You can put in hints, but delay explanations for
later paragraphs – or later chapters.”
Is there anything special about
dealing with longer works – series, or even spin-offs?
One of Maisano’s suggestions goes
against frequently-quoted writing advice, but remember, she’s speaking as an
editor whose clients’ previous works have indicated enough reader interest to
make sequels worthwhile. And that is, use a preface.
This is especially helpful to deal
with world building (an issue for genres such as fantasy), and to keep track of
what happened in the continuing story of the main character.
Even with a preface, don’t expect
random readers to grasp much of the more subtle plot issues, but do include plenty
of hints and Easter eggs to keep super fans (and even the ideal reader)
satisfied.
The ideal goal is convert even the
random reader into a super reader!
For more about what Maisano likes,
see her page at Manuscript Wish List.
(Tomorrow: I close a week of posts
about the 2017 DFW Writers Conference with author/blogger Annie Neugebauer’s tips
on the multiple uses of a query pitch.)
No comments:
Post a Comment