Showing posts with label North Texas writing conferences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Texas writing conferences. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2020

Last look at WORDfest – then on to virtual future!

(Revised to correct #RevPit dates; cancellation of Writefest Houston & DFW Writers Conference)

Writers—need a break from that “locked in” feeling? From old familiar faces? From long term commitments? I don’t have a cure for the pandemic, only for a change of writing pace, from long form to short form, with hints from master short story writer William Ledbetter



A Nebula Award-winning author of dozens of speculative fiction short stories and articles, Ledbetter discussed his guidelines for “Writing and Marketing Short Fiction” at this year’s virtual version of North Texas WORDfest

He only had to tell his audience to skip the synopsis— “it’s a short story!”—to catch the attention of this writer struggling with that most dreaded to-do for book length works. 

Then there was ability to engage with a completely new set of characters for each short story. And of course, the time element. Not that Ledbetter dashes out stories offhand—he sometimes spends as much as two weeks on one—but I mentally compared this to the months, sometimes years, lavished on novel writing. It didn’t hurt either to hear we can skip dealing with agents and submit our short stories directly to publishers.  

(Most agents, in fact, will not represent short story writers, although Ledbetter didn’t rebuff the agent who offered representation after reading his Nebula-winning short story, “The Long Fall Up.” It was an offer that later resulted in Ledbetter’s first novel publication, Level Five.)

Still, some of Ledbetter’s “musts” for short story publication carry over into long form fiction. “First, read the guidelines,” he warned.

“If the story doesn’t follow the guidelines or the writer hasn’t checked the spelling the slush reader and editor will say, ‘this isn’t for us.’ You want your story to be so good that they’ll read all the way to the end. . . Good enough isn’t good enough. Make sure it’s the best story you can possibly write.”

For writing that best story, first pages are critically important. With a short story, within the first two or three pages, you have to supply context. (By context, he means, why should the story begin where it does and why should the reader care.) And, have a great ending! “It’s a good idea to have something at the beginning that ties into the ending. It’s satisfying when a story comes full circle.”

On the other hand, “one of the things (editors) always say is, ‘read our magazine.’ The problem is writers may simply write clones of previously published stories with the serial numbers filed off.”

Write the story you want to write, Ledbetter said, then look for a publication that’s a match for it.

To find those publications, he suggests two major resources,  Duotrope’s Digest and  The Submission Grinder.

“These allow you to track your submissions and also provide information about other markets.” (Duotrope requires a subscription fee of $5/month or $50/year and also has a larger data base than The Submission Grinder, which is free.) 

“You can also search by genre, like if you’re writing a Western or a romance story, as well as providing information on contests and anthologies.” 

And as always, be persistent and patient. Not to mention thick-skinned. There will be rejections. 
The first three professional markets Ledbetter, already a well-established writer, approached for the story that would go on to win the Nebula rejected it. The fourth one, of course, was the charm.

***

In this time of sheltering at home, it was a relief to hear Shayla Raquel’s online emphasis for “Your Best Book Launch Ever.”

Her must-haves for that perfect launch:

·       The best book you can possibly write
·       Professionally edited
·       With a professional cover
·       And professional formatting
·       A user-friendly, mobile-friendly website
·       Author platform (social media presence, community of influencers, email list, etc.)
·       At least three months to execute the launch

Did she say three months? How about planning one year in advance of publication—starting to use that website and platform to post about research, cover reveals, and more!

Shayla Raquel
And if it sounds as if she’s talking only to authors planning to self-publish, she’s not. It’s even possible to relaunch a previously published book. And if by “platform” you think she means being on every possible social media outlet, she’s not. “Find two you love, including your blog. . . The way you (build platform) is by being authentic, (posting) about things that make me fall in love with you. You don’t have to sell your book.”

Writers do, however, “need to have goals so you can achieve them,” Raquel insisted, because you’ll be launching on that “complex beast” Amazon. “Your book launch depends on making this animal work for you, not against you.”

Make it work by researching categories, prices, and endorsers.
     
Think of Amazon categories as genres, Raquel told her audience. Pick the most relevant ones, but rather than choosing “science fiction and fantasy,” which is too broad, get more specific with categories such as “technothriller.” Then research the competition. “It will be hard to outsell authors in categories they dominate,” and launching writers will strive to find categories in which their books have a chance to become bestsellers.

And about pricing—“it’s an art, not a science.” Check the most common prices for ebooks in the chosen category, remembering that prices can always be changed. Raquel’s suggestions are to launch at 99 cents the first week. “You want it to be a no-brainer for someone to buy that book.” Later pricing can go up to $2.99 to $3.99 for ebooks and as much as $12.99-$19.99 for paperbacks, depending on genre. (Note: for KDP, authors must change their royalty setting to be able to sell at 99 cents.)

To find endorsers, Raquel recommends cultivating book bloggers, as well as checking out book promotion sites, whose prices can vary from free to “very expensive.” Both tasks should be done prior to launch. Although she suggested several, writers may want to check out book bloggers and promotional sites as well as contests with possible prizes at the all-purpose Reedsy site.

***
And now, for something else to do while sheltering at home—check out the WRiTE CLUB 2020 Twitter party this coming Thursday, April 9, at #WRiTECLUBDFW. Fifteen slushpile readers (including me) for DL Hammons’ annual readers’ choice contest will tweet about our wish lists before the contest closes April 19. 

And while you’re on Twitter, don’t forget Revise & Resub’s annual #RevPit contest coming up April 18-19. 


***
Sorry but not surprised to report that both Writefest Houston (originally scheduled May 4-10), and DFWCon, (originally scheduled June 12-13) have been cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Look for it both to return in 20121. Tickets purchased for DFWCon will be applied to the 2021 convention unless otherwise requested. See the site for details or to request refunds.

Monday, April 29, 2019

Downwrite & dirty: confessions of a slush pile reader

It’s not the beginning of the end, but as Winston Churchill said, it’s the end of the beginning. The end of the beginning of WRiTE CLUB, that is, the anonymous writing contest sprung from the brain of MG/YA writer DL Hammons, which I mentioned in the last post on this site before I disappeared under the deluge of the 189 writing samples submitted by 132 writers from around the globe. Although not all writers used their full 500-word allowance, those 189 entries translate to nearly 95,000 words – the equivalent of reading a novel written in more than a hundred styles and almost, it sometimes seemed, as many genres. 

It was an amazing, refreshing, humbling and ultimately hopeful experience.

And it’s only just begun. As I write this, the first two contestants to gain enough votes from me and the other 19 WRiTE CLUB slush pile readers have entered the ring and are duking it out for approval of any reader who wants to weigh in. Tomorrow another pair will vie, and so on every weekday through May 17. 

Voting on each bout stays open for a week, so would-be readers who missed the opening round Monday, April 29, still have until noon on Sunday, May 6, to cast their votes, with final votes on all first-week contestants closing May 9, and so on. 
image: pixabay

After the third week, three previous losers from each of the initial weeks will be given second chances, in three-person cage bouts followed by a pair of semi-final rounds. Those left standing (including a wild card contestant) will advance until the final round, when a party of celebrity judges makes the final choice, to be announced at the 2019 DFW Writers Conference, June 22-23.

Please note that up to the penultimate stage of the game, we as readers will turn thumbs up or down – and, writers hope, provide commentary explaining our choices. 

Because contest entrants are anonymous – their real names known only to Hammons' wife, whose behind the scenes work qualify her for a spouse-of-the-year award, writers may vote for their own entries. The slush pile readers who read the initial entries, winnowing them to a field of 30, may also vote. This will give all writers who made the first cut of 30 (out of 189) valuable feedback on their appeal to readers. All Hammons asks is that we use our own identities when voting and posting comments. And, that we not lobby for particular entries or attempt to influence the votes of others.

I explained in a previous post (“A straight shot to this WRiTE CLUB judge’s heart,” April 2), what a writing sample took to gain my favor. Some other slush pile readers joined in on Twitter with #revpit-style thumbprint analyses of what they liked – or not – in sample reads. However, we did not compare notes. 

Neither of the first two entries that hit the ring this week was among my personal picks, although I admit to voting for another entry from one of the writers. And although I favor adult thrillers, mysteries and historical fiction in my reading for pleasure, my votes went to writing writers designated as both adult and young adult, and to which they applied genre labels including "contemporary," "fantasy" (in which I include "magical realism" and "urban fantasy"), "horror," "romance," and more. Some of my favorite entries were those I would have labeled "humor," although they paraded under other genre titles.

In an email this week, Hammons noted that of the 189 entries, a record 168 received at least one vote from his panel of slush pile readers. Of even the remainder, no doubt some judges – including myself – noted intriguing concepts, characters or settings. And all participating writers deserve respect for devotion to their vision and willingness to share their work. Truly, there were far, far more outstanding and worthy writers than the initial group of 30 WRiTE CLUB fighters can indicate. 

And so, Hammons offered this suggestion to us 20, so far relatively anonymous slush pile readers. Will we provide feedback to writers (with their permission) who didn't make the initial cut of 30? I'm willing, and I hope other readers – and writers – will take up the challenge.

In the meantime, keep those votes and comments coming at WRiTE CLUB