New Year’s countdown of 2018 reader favs: day 3

For day 3 of this countdown to readers’ favorite posts from 2018, here’s one with still spot-on tips on thriller writing from a master of historically-based thrillers, Steve Berry, first published March 23, 2018.

***

The thought of attending an author’s book tour talk in a restaurant intrigued me. Add that the author was master thriller writer Steve Berry, speaking at one of my favorite Italian restaurants, and, well, count me in. Berry’s specialty is thrillers with a historical hook, and his latest is The Bishop’s Pawn, a fictionalized analysis of the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., on April 4, 1968.

It’s both the most immediately pertinent one, debuting in this 50^th anniversary year of King’s murder, and the hardest for Berry to write, “because it’s history I remember,” he told his audience.

That element of personal remembrance led Berry to alter his long-standing habit of writing books in the third person. For the first time ever in The Bishop’s Pawn, long-time Berry sleuth Cotton Malone speaks in his own right, in first person.

But Berry’s switch from third-person to first-person narration didn’t alter his two must-haves for writing historical thrillers: an “ooh” factor and a “so-what” factor. The “ooh” factor is the book’s hook, its defining historical event. The “so-what” factor is the way that historical event changed the world.

The crux of the story in The Bishop’s Pawn – the possibility of a botched coverup of the assassination due to the conflict between King and then-FBI director J. Edgar Hoover – occurred to Berry about a decade ago. Other layers accrued around the story during the 18 months – and the reading of hundreds of books – that are Berry’s normal research schedule for each book.

“I can’t make up (the history),” Berry said. “It has to be real.”

The more he read – and watched and listened to the video of King’s last iconic “I’ve been to the mountaintop” speech given the night before his death, the more convinced Berry became that King had a presentiment of the end.

Steve Berry & wife Elizabeth

“Listen to it all,” Berry said, noting that King had initially tried to avoid speaking because he was ill, essentially having collapsed after delivering address. “The speech is about mortality. Every word sounds like a man who knew he was about to die.”

“I was very respectful of King and his message. (But) everything went wrong for him in the last year of his life,” Berry said, citing the apparent failure of King’s message of nonviolence in the face of the Vietnam War, and the increasing racial unrest, personal difficulties, and Hoover’s ongoing campaign of persecution.

Following King’s death, Hoover would announce that there had been no conspiracy, and that a drifter named James Earl Ray was the sole killer.

In the present day, when FBI directors seemingly serve only at the whim of a president, it’s difficult to fathom the power Hoover held. Originally appointed as director of the FBI’s predecessor organization in the 1920’s, Hoover helped found the FBI in the following decade. He remained in control of the organization until his death in 1972.

Horrifying allegations against Hoover have surfaced since, many rendered unprovable due to his private secretary’s destruction of Hoover’s secret files.

(Since Hoover’s death, law changes now limit the time an FBI director may serve.)

But to return to Berry’s conspiracy theory. Consider, he said, that James Earl Ray, although untrained, supposedly managed to kill King with a single bullet fired from a rooming house window. “What are the odds?”

Added to the improbable display of marksmanship is the inability to match the badly-fragmented bullet to Ray’s rifle, as well as uncertainty that he was even in the house from which the bullet was supposedly fired. And then there’s Ray’s penchant for both confessing to the killing and endlessly recanting that confession, making him “the perfect guy to (pin) a murder on, because you couldn’t believe anything he said.”

OK, an audience member asked, then who was involved in Berry’s supposed conspiracy against King?

“Can’t tell you,” Berry said with a smile, “because that would give away the book.”

Steve Berry on the world-changing must-haves for thrillers

The thought of attending an author’s book tour talk in a restaurant intrigued me. Add that the author was master thriller writer Steve Berry, speaking at one of my favorite Italian restaurants, and well, count me in. Berry’s specialty is thrillers with a historical hook, and his latest is The Bishop’s Pawn, a fictionalized analysis of the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. on April 4, 1968. 

It’s both the most immediately pertinent one, debuting in this 50^th anniversary year of King’s murder, and the hardest for Berry to write, “because it’s history I remember.” 

Those elements of personal remembrance may have led Berry to alter his long-standing habit of writing books in the third person. For the first time ever, in The Bishop’s Pawn, long-time Berry sleuth Cotton Malone speaks in the first person, in his own right.

Each book, Berry told his audience this week at Maggiano’s restaurant in Dallas’s NorthPark Center, must possess his two “must-haves: an ‘ooh’ factor and a ‘so-what’ factor.” The “ooh” is the hook. The “so-what” is the way that historical event changed the world.

Berry & wife Elizabeth

The nugget of the story in The Bishop’s Pawn – the possibility of a botched coverup of the assassination due to the conflict between King and then FBI director J. Edgar Hoover -- had come to Berry about a decade ago and wouldn’t let him, Other layers accrued around the story during the 18 months – and the reading of the hundreds of books – that are Berry’s normal research schedule for each book. 

“I can’t make up (the history),” Berry said. “It has to be real.”

And the more he read – and watched and listened to the video of King’s last, iconic “I've been to the mountaintop” speech, given the night before his death, the more convinced he became that King had a presentiment of the end.

“Listen to it all,” Berry told his audience, noting that King had tried to avoid speaking because he was ill essentially collapsed after delivering one of his most famous addresses. “The speech is about mortality. Every word sounds like a man who knew he was about to die.

“I was very respectful of King and his message. (But) everything went wrong for him in the last year of his life,” Berry said, citing the apparent failure of the message of nonviolence in the face of the Vietnam War and increasing racial unrest, personal difficulties, and the ongoing Machiavellian presence of Hoover and his campaign of persecution against King.

Following King’s death, Hoover would make the decision that there had been no conspiracy, and that a drifter named James Earl Ray was the sole killer.

In the present day, when FBI directors seemingly serve only at the whim of a president, it becomes difficult to fathom the degree of power Hoover held. Originally appointed as director of the FBI’s predecessor organization in the 1920’s, Hoover helped found the FBI in the 1930’s and remained in control until his death in 1972. 

Although horrifying allegations against Hoover have surfaced since then, many can never be proven because Hoover’s private secretary destroyed his secret files after his death.

(Since Hoover’s death, law changes now limit the time an FBI director can serve.)

But to return to Berry’s conspiracy theory. Consider, Berry asked his audience, that James Earl Ray was not a trained killer, but supposedly managed with a single bullet fired from a rooming house window, managed to kill King. “What are the odds?”

In addition, the recovered bullet was too fragmented to be matched to Ray’s rifle. And uncertainty that he was even in the house from which the bullet was supposed to have been fired. And Ray’s own penchant for confessing and endlessly recanting that confession, “the perfect guy to (pin) a murder on, because you couldn’t believe anything he said.”

OK, an audience member asked, then who was involved in Berry’s supposed conspiracy against Martin Luther King?

“Can’t tell you,” Berry said with a smile, “because that would give away the book.”

(Later, I hope to provide a review of The Bishop’s Pawn – again, without spoilers – as well as another intriguing offer from Berry, and nuggets about his next book. And even the book after that . . . .)