Showing posts with label slushpile readers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label slushpile readers. Show all posts

Monday, April 13, 2020

What WRiTE CLUB slushpile readers want to see!

It’s crunch time for submissions to the 2020 edition (and ninth year!) of DL Hammons WRiTE CLUB contest. Entries for the readers’ choice event are due this coming Sunday, April 19. And although one of the winner’s perks – recognition at the DFW Writers Conference – will be missing, a victim of the current pandemic, there’s still plenty to gain.

The top 30 submissions, as determined by Hammons’ volunteer crew of slushpile readers, will receive feedback from online readers. And the surviving finalists will get eyes on their writing samples from publishing industry pros. 

This year I return as one of those slush readers winnowing the initial entrants. We joined Hammons recently on Twitter to share the secrets of what it takes to win our hearts. I’ll recap while expanding on my own preferences. Pay attention – you may just find yourself in the winner’s circle!

It should not need saying but I will -- contestants need to produce a strong writing sample. 
image: pixabay

Over and over, slushpile readers made statements such as, “Writing quality is my highest weighted category. A really well-written piece can make up for other things I might not like.” 

And, “Give me a STRONG hook! I cannot stress this enough. Grab me before my mind and wander and don’t let me go until the end.”

Or, “Great writing is my number one criteria. I know that’s subjective, but for me it’s about whether your story draws me in: is your dialogue realistic, do you have the right blend of dialogue, emotions, action, and world building.”

And with a 500-word limit on entries, every blow – I mean word – has to punch above its weight. 

“What’s the key to my vote?” another slushpile reader tweeted. “It’s really, really, simple: tight writing. SUPER tight. No dramatics, no clichés. I don’t even care what genre; a strong premise is only a bonus. I just want to know you can tell a story.”

So, does a 500-word limit mean the contest is limited to flash fiction? Not at all. Flash is perfectly OK, but those of the 30 original contestants who make it through the early rounds of reader feedback will be expected to produce additional – and longer – writing samples. This probably explains why most of the entries I’ve seen so far appear to be excerpts from longer works. 

But as I’ve told my own critique group, the writing sample doesn’t have to be verbatim from a longer piece. Choosing which elements are essential and which can be temporarily dispensed with is an art. What I’ve seen a little too much of, both this year and last, when I also read slush, is the lack of arc. There may be lyrical writing or great character sketches, but even with only a fragment of scene, the sample has to show a potential to go somewhere, to have legs.

As a fellow slushie tweeted, “A gripping first sentence does a lot for me, but something has to actually happen in the story. It can’t just be all exposition.”

Other tweets – “I was glued to the story. . .”

“The writer managed to get into my head. . .” 

And, “Make me forget about #COVID-19. Even if only for a few minutes. Give me a story that will consume my mind and emotions with something else.”

So, you’ve got a strong opening, a gripping middle. . . how about that ending? Remembering it’s not necessarily the ending of the entire story, only of this 500-word fragment. 

Slushies say, “Bonus points for a surprise ending. . . I really LOVE surprise endings.” And, “One of my favorites so far had a fantastic twist at the end. I want to know what happens!” And, “If it’s not a short (story) with closure, I need at least a signpost or tip of the hat as to where the author is taking me.”

A slushpile reader quoted earlier not caring about genre, but some do pine for more variation in genres. Admittedly, with most entries expected in this final week, it’s still surprising that I’ve counted fewer than a half-dozen YA submissions. 

Other slushies tweeted, “I’d love to see some nonfiction and memoirs,” and “I wouldn’t mind seeing more horror entries. . . hint, hint.” (Although another noted, “I like my horror IMPLIED, not graphic or gory!” Slushpile readers also like humor, either as a stand-alone genre or sprinkled into other genres. And speaking personally, I’m a sucker for mysteries, historicals, and thrillers.

And although great writing is tops on we slushies’ lists of must-haves, we’re not immune to pickier issues. “Suck me in, trap me, make me care,” one tweeted. “I’m more lax on grammar. I’ll even skip over it if I’m engrossed but if it comes down to a submission with good grammar vs. one with not-go-good. . .”

And, “If I’m debating between two great pieces, proper grammar can tip the scales.” And another, “I’m not a huge stickler for grammar mistakes, but it if keeps pulling out of the story? It will affect my vote at that point.”

So, there you have it, writers! Great writing, strong beginning, a story arc with strong ending. And don’t ignore your word processor’s grammar suggestions. Now hie thee to the WRiTE CLUB site and enter!

Sunday, December 29, 2019

Countdown to readers’ favs for 2019, day 2

Can 2019 be almost past? No worries – as we wait for the ball to drop, readers can relive their top 10 favorite posts. Yesterday we saw numbers 10 and 9. Today, we countdown from number 8, first published May 18:

Will give feedback for a WRiTE CLUB vote

The last entries of the last week of the preliminary bouts of the readers’ choice WRiTE CLUB contest have been received. By this time, all 132 writers who entered know whether they made the initial list of 30 entries. Or not. You’ve tuned in every day, noted the players and (I hope) voted and critiqued whether your piece was on the line or not.

At this point last year, when I entered the contest as a writer, I would have learned that my entries didn’t make the initial cut of 30 contestants and probably spent a few days dropping tears on my keyboard. But I still followed the contest. Still voted and critiqued. And this year, though I’m invested in the contest, not as a writer but as one of 20 initial slush pile readers, I’m still voting and critiquing.
image: Pixabay

And whether you won your round or lost (and all of this week’s bouts are still being voted on), or never saw the words you spent so much time crafting on the screen at all, I hope you’ll stay invested as well. Will still watch, vote, and critique your fellow writers. Not that you need an incentive except the chance to help fellow writers but WRiTE CLUB organizer DL Hammons has added one – everyone who sent a writing sample to the contest can receive feedback from us slush pile readers. If you vote and critique.

It doesn’t have to be in every round. Mop your tears, open your internet browser and connect. 

Even without having submitted my writing to the contest, I have a few tears to mop up. Out of the entries – a total of 189 from those 132 writers – I marked more than 70 as “favorites” after my first read-through. Plus more than a handful of “maybes” that deserved a second reading.

Try to imagine the agony of paring all those down to only 30. And tossing them into the ring with the 30 top picks of 19 other slushies. Only eight of my 30 ended up in the preliminary bouts. Only eight! (Although in a few instances, second entries from writers I picked made the cut.)

Still, I long to pass on my comments, compliments and congratulations to all the other writers in that packed field. I’m looking at you, sexy Scottish gladiator who made me think “Outlander” slays “Twilight.” And the writer of that super creepy Gothic (“Elephant Man” meets “The Thirteenth Tale”). And the update of Poe’s horror classic, “Premature Burial” for the 21st century. 

Ditto the Maserati-driving thriller-killer. And the beauty queen comeuppance-er. And so many more. 

Even as I had to sadly note “no” to some writing samples, I often found a cool premise, an interesting character, a scene that would have only needed some tweaking to make the cut.

You’re all so great, I’m sure you’ve been voting all along. But in case you haven’t. In case you’ve been in a hospital, in jail, in a war zone, or on a mountain retreat with no internet access for the last month, there’s still time to participate. Please do. I’m counting on you.

Even as I had to sadly note “no” to some writing samples, I often found a cool premise, an interesting character, a scene that would have only needed some tweaking to make the cut.

You’re all so great, I’m sure you’ve been voting all along. But in case you haven’t. In case you’ve been in a hospital, in jail, in a war zone, or on a mountain retreat with no internet access for the last month, there’s still time to participate. Please do. I’m counting on you.

Or, in case all your devices lost all your contact information, check DL Hammons' site for information about how to stay connected with the contest and keep your hat in the ring for some cool prizes. And the eternal friendship of a lot of other writers!

***

Another WRiTE Club-related post made number 7 of 2019’s all-time hits, this one first published April 1:

A straight shot to this WRiTE CLUB judge’s heart

OK, people, it’s two weeks into submissions for DL Hammons’ annual WRiTE CLUB challenge. And after several years of participation in WRiTE CLUB, the readers’ choice writing contest, I’m now on the inside as a judge (aka slushpile reader). There’s some amazing stuff coming in – and some I wish had been tweaked just a little more. It’s made me think deeply about what I – as a reader – want to see from writers.

A little over two weeks in, I’ve seen about 50 submissions, with the vast majority of the expected 200 or so still to come – most in the final week, ending April 14. Each will be read by me and the other 19 judges before readers at large have a chance to vote. So, taking a tip from several of my 20 fellow judges’ Twitter postings, here’s a list of five things that will make me say Yes! to a 500-word writing sample.

1.     An authentic human character 
2.     Who wants something
3.     And is willing to go through hell to get it
4.     And tell us about it with clarity
5.     And honesty

Darn, you say, stopping at item #1. Your main character is an anthropomorphic animal, a supernatural being, even an inanimate object. (Not that I’ve seen those yet, but it’s still early days.) Fear not. Pick the closest thing to a human trait your nonhuman character has and work it, baby. Work it even harder if your main character is a cliché, a generic (fill in the blank), or has all the depth of a wet Kleenex. 

And please, PUH-LEEZ make her/him/them/it desire something. It can be the most godawful thing you can imagine, as long (at least initially) as the character is willing to work to gain it. Maybe she wants to be king. Maybe they just want to live to the end of their tour of duty. Maybe he wants to strike the match that will keep him from freezing to death. Just, for the love of dog, make them do something. I’ll give you a little leeway for backstory or navel-gazing. Maybe two sentences, three tops. Then get those characters up and working to achieve their heart’s desire.